[ejonesie22]

So explain to me how being for making pot readily available is not a PRO POT POV. Furthermore your ally has referred to those like me as Anti Pot, and that is not the first I have heard that.

So...

And before you come back, again, with a pro freedom response, exactly where does your pro freedom argument end?

[discostu]

It’s very simple you see your whole “PRO POT” is a strawman you use pathetically to try to corner people and avoid troubling things like logic. I use logic. And I don’t have an “ally” there just happen to be other people that realize that the WOD is failed AND want it to end (as opposed to you who admitted it failed but still want it around anyway).

I already explained to you where the freedom logically ends. There was apparently too much logic in it, you didn’t even bother to reply with one of your strawmen. 105.