Did I, or did I not respond to you? The answer, for the slow, is yes.
I talked about why I figured evolution was a valid thing. So far you have given bupkiss as an answer. Go back, read, with comprehension enabled, then we can talk.
Otherwise - F off.
I really detest creationists. They deny the glory of the Lord.
You have the patience of a saint, but there’s a point where it’s about the same as arguing with Ignatius J. Reilly. At some point after reading about the sun basketball virgins I was shocked not to hear him go on about Greyhound Scenicruisers
What an idiotic statement.
I explained to you, at length, why evolutionism is totally irrational, and linked to an article that put the argument much better than I ever could (which you never even bothered to click on). You responded not a word. Not one.
So, you think it "increases" G-d's glory to employ secondary means to accomplish things? What secondary means did he employ to impregnate the virgin? To raise the dead? What secondary means did Mary employ to play basketball with the sun?
Oh no, there was no secondary means employed here. Only with ex nihilation does G-d supposedly employ secondary means for His "greater glory."
You, sir or madam, are so brainwashed you can't think. Farewell.