Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut
It strikes me as a case of a lot of scholars pondering the nature of God requiring perfection in human form and just how that might be possible, extending that to Mary, and over centuries of layer upon layer of elaboration, creating doctrine of this speculation despite there being no presence of such claims in scripture.

The problem with this perfecting of Mary, the ever-virgin, the sinless, the bodily assumed, outside of the lack of scriptural validation, is that a perfect, sinless Mary would have had the same, physical issues as far as the inherited sin nature, as Jesus would have had, if all the learned and elaborate speculations and intellectualizations regarding His birth were actually the case.

Accepting that He was born of a virgin and that virgin was Mary, who was regarded as special and unique among women and therefore capable of bearing the Christ Child is as far as I'll go.

36 posted on 03/17/2012 3:15:36 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Agreed. Thank you for your measured and well thought out response.


54 posted on 03/17/2012 3:36:57 PM PDT by reaganaut ("I once was lost, but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson