Thank you. That was exactly my point. I wonder how many other people reading articles such as this do not know it either?
The author was making a correct broader point: that the Septuagint was the source of inspirational reading for the 1 century Jews. He overshot it a little bit claiming that it was not only inspirational reading but liturgical reading.
Certainly low-church Protestants should not even notice the distinction because they have no liturgy.