[BroJoeK]

annalex: "I am here to tell you that a boundary exist, -- no matter how fast you move definitions, -- which cannot be crossed through random mutations."

And you define this alleged "boundary" as what, exactly?
And your physical evidence for this supposed "boundary" is what, exactly?
And your scientific hypothesis which explains why there should be such an alleged "boundary" is what, exactly?
And your scientific confirmations for this hypothesis, confirmations which could turn it into a recognized scientific theory, are what, exactly?

And the names of the scientists, and their scientific qualifications, who found the physical evidence, proposed the scientific hypothesis and then confirmed it, are who, exactly?
And the peer-reviewed scientific literature reporting and discussing this amazing "boundary hypothesis" is to be found where, exactly.

Of course, the real answers to all those questions are "none", "nobody" and "nowhere" because, because, because this alleged "boundary" is not scientific at all, it's a religious idea.

Isn't it, FRiend?

[annalex]

The boundary is a population, let's call it Species Proper, that can interbreed at least in laboratory setting, produce offspring, and the offspring can likewise interbreed; productive interbreeding with another Species Proper is not possible or becomes not possible after several generations; the subsequent generations of a Species Proper are generally healthy to sustain their number in a given stable environment, natural or emulating natural. For example, artificial climate control is an emulated natural environment; routine drug injections or corrective surgeries are not.

The evidence is absent that any known Species Proper evolve into another Species Proper. It is then is a boundary by laws of nature.

The experiment to falsify this is easy to define: pick the original population, inseminate and manipulate the embryos randomly, emulating a random mutation. Adjust the climate to favor a certain developing feature. Let the sick die and repeat insemination and gene alteration with the healthy adult specimens. Make control inseminations of healthy specimen with the original species. Observe the core population stable, and control inseminations progressively less successful, to the point of becoming impossible.

If this experiment is successful, it will prove the foundation of the evolutionary hypothesis: that given time and changing environment, random mutations will produce a new Species Proper better suited for the changed environment.

Prove me wrong by experiment; not by calling in cult authorities.