Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head

Jeff, you know I respect you, but there really is no Biblical support for baptism for the dead. If there were, the Bible is my authority, and I would follow it. No other book, no other claim to revelation, can trump the Bible.

Although I am sure there have been many excellent words spent debating this point by scholars more worthy than I, the article below gives a brief overview of the essential points, from a traditional Christian point of view:

http://carm.org/baptism-for-the-dead-in-1-corinthians-15-29

As someone else here has already pointed out, no one in the Bible, either Christ or the Apostles, ever sanctioned baptism for the dead as a Christian ordinance.

Instead, in 1 Corinthians 15:29, Paul is arguing for a general belief in the possibility of human resurrection, and uses what is probably a local pagan practice to illustrate his point, because not even the local pagan baptizers of the dead (and there were such folks near Corinth) would do so unless there were a resurrection coming in which to collect the hoped for benefit.

But Paul never says, “Therefore, you go do this.” As an attorney, I see this sort of mistake all the time in legal analysis. A court writes an opinion, and uses some illustration to make a point. But it’s not the holding, not the endpoint of the logic of the opinion, just a decoration used to enlighten the reader along the way.

Yet the young lawyer (or the old lawyer who’s a poor reader) latches onto the illustration as if it were a statement of law, which it is not, and in court they go down in flames because they could not make the distinction. But the judge can. And the better attorney can. Find the holding, and go with that. Use the illustrations as the writer used them. No more. No less.

I am reformed in my theology. One of the lesser known but very valuable aspects of that tradition is known as the Regulative Principle. Realizing that the Bible is the very word of God, we have an extremely serious obligation to be sure we do not impose burdens on the human soul that God Himself does not impose. We therefore cannot make an obligation out of something which no person in Scripture issued as a command to the Church. That was the error of the Pharisees, and Jesus condemned them severely for it.

And what are those things posed in Scripture as commands of action to Christians, as under the authority of Christ and the Apostles? Have faith in Jesus. Reject false christs. Flee from idolatry. Flee from sexual sin. Wait patiently for Jesus to return. Do good while you wait. Love each other. Love your enemy. On and on I could go.

But there is no command in the Bible to baptize surrogate believers for dead nonbelievers. Not only does Paul use strictly descriptive rather than imperative language, but he never even tells us whether the “dead” being vicariously baptized were believers or not. And of course that’s not his point, so why should he mention it?

And so the Regulative Principle informs us that in the absence of such a command, we not only have no authority from God to impose such a practice on believers, but that if we do so impose, without authority, we usurp the role of God, and make ourselves greater than him. God sets the terms of his own worship. He has told us what we need to do, and we sin if we either subtract from it or add to it practices that have no command authority from Him.

Remember the sin under Moses of the two sons of Aaron? What was their crime, that was so great God struck them dead for it? It was offering to God a form of worship which He did not command, burning an incense other than the one God required. Strange fire, as it is called.

Happily, God is a God of mercy, and he knows we sometimes wander from his way through ignorance or misinformation, and he hardly ever strikes us down immediately for our many errors. Else who could serve him?

But he does require of us to live according to the light he has given us. If some folks still mistakenly but innocently think they are helping out by baptism for the dead, God is their judge. Not me. But those who do lay claim to understanding the Scripture, if they impose a false and pagan practice on well-meaning but uninformed individuals, they will be held to a higher and sterner standard. Few stripes and many stripes.

Jeff, I take you to be a man of integrity. I hope you will take these words as from love and not vainglory. The wounds of a friend are faithful.

Peace,

SR


41 posted on 05/24/2012 3:45:04 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer
Thank you SR. Your post was beautiful in your explanation of the Biblical Point of view. Thank you again for a thoughtful insight into the Biblical View
66 posted on 05/24/2012 10:58:28 PM PDT by BooBoo1000 ("The plans I have for you are plans to prosper you.,not to harm you, Plans to give you hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson