I asked why you think it doesn’t.
Your explanation was: it doesn’t.
Which doesn’t help me understand why you think it doesn’t when it does.
>>”I asked why you think it doesn’t.
Actually you stated: “You then contend Scripture is incomplete, and subsequent revelations have been pronounced with equal gravitas.
This was in response to my post: “If that structure is sola scriptura, yes - for certain “One Lord, one faith, one baptism” cannot exist with it....
Which was in reply to your:” then Christianity crumbles”
The topic was Christianity crumbling, One Lord, one faith..., the unworkability of sola scriptura.
I was staying on topic - and saying just what I was contending.
I’m not going to argue for what you say I am contending. Nor would I expect you to accept what I say you are saying.
If you would like to change the subject and discuss another aspect of sola scriptura or another topic entirely, I’m willing. Provided you don’t contend to tell me what I’m contending.
:)