My comment concerning "bloody hands" was speaking directly and solely to that very incident, and none other.
You said "they started it" pointing to an exact point which you claim they did so. Were any other than Huguenots injured or killed THERE, at that precise juncture?
At that point, those particular Huguenots had not harmed anyone that I know of.
Now later, back and forth provocation and bitter retribution went back and forth for quite some years. I never have pretended it did not. But it continually seems as if you believe I did, or was attempting to? Good GOD it is SO difficult to communicate with hyper-sensitive hyper-defensive Catholics on this forum!
Sometimes, I don't know why I bother, but I sure-as -shooting see why so many other freepers (Catholic & non-Catholic alike) give this ghetto a wide berth.
So, just like the Dimocrat elite they wanted to replace government with their own police state
The huguenots were the rebels against conservatives, with attacks on Churchs in 1560 and an attempt by CAlvinists to kidnap the King Francis II
Good GOD it is SO difficult to communicate with hyper-sensitive hyper-defensive Calvinists who think of Calvin as “the liberator” — ha ha! that’s a joke...
..involves the assumption, by the Boers, that they were a chosen people of God...Since the non-whites were obviously damned,.. the natives must naturally take a subservient role in society.