[Olog-hai]

What’s so horrid about scientists today is that they know that DNA, RNA and even many enzymes are computer programs so sophisticated that they can barely decode fragments of them, yet they are so closed-minded that they cannot permit themselves to acknowledge any superior intelligence (which requires a being possessing such intelligence) that would have wrote them despite knowing it had to have been written and did not merely happen by chance. How can even the scientific method proceed with closed minds in the discipline?

[daniel1212]

Interesting.
A poster theophile on the Post page writes,

The Holy grail for science is “The Unified Field Theory”, this “grail” would predict any outcome of science with certainty. The “ether theory”, and the “massXConstant,squared=energy” theory, for some was concluded with Einsteins MC2 demonstration with the bomb.

Ether theory is nothing new, Tesla’s florescent lights, radio, AC generation and transmission, were developed along it’s lines with uncanny predictability: From Teslas head, to a working model, with very little in between.

So the Ether theorists had some credibility after all! Better break out those 100 year old textbooks, and the Bible, there might be things we can learn without building giant hadron colliders