Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
No fewer than 4 priests commented on the appropriateness of the particular reading chosen and that it was permitted by the bishops per the priest's judgment of appropriateness.

As I tried to explain previously, neither you, nor I, nor any number of priests, gets to override what the Missal says.

I don't care if 150 priests "commented on the appropriateness of the particular reading chosen". If it's not in the Missal, it's not one of the readings permitted.

That's called "holy obedience". You'll recall that a lack of obedience was what got Satan in trouble.

133 posted on 07/13/2012 5:36:43 AM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets; Campion
As I tried to explain previously, neither you, nor I, nor any number of priests, gets to override what the Missal says.

And that's what this thread is about. You improvised, spunkets, and it appears you are trying to blame the Church for the problems it caused you.

What was the purpose of the prepared notes you forgot?

134 posted on 07/13/2012 9:25:06 AM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson