Well, I could have cut and paste a section from Wikipedia and a non-working link myself, but thanks.
Now, we know that these supposed images in the eyes were only recently detected, with advances in digital imagery. Therefore, all of these studies you cite could not have anything relevant to say on this matter, since the latest was made in 1982, years before these images were detected. So, where are all the recent scientific studies that have continually validated this assertion?
oh im sorry, i havent received my monthly subscription to Our Lady of Guadualupe Peer Reviews Only magazine...
seriously?
wikipedia or not, they are four studies done over the years showing no signs of fakery....
so far, on your side, you have produced zero evidence scientifcally, that it is a fake of any sort...nice try though...