To: SeekAndFind
It makes sense that Jesus would have a wife. Jesus was addressed as Rabbi by his followers. Since Jesus was a Jew and would have followed Jewish law, Jewish law stated that you cannot be a Rabbi unless you are married.
27 posted on
09/18/2012 5:54:23 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Those who pay no taxes and depend upon government are Government PETS.)
To: BuffaloJack
RE: Jewish law stated that you cannot be a Rabbi unless you are married.
I have asked Orthodox rabbis they cannot find a requirement in the Talmud that requires a rabbit to be married.
However, they did find two talmudic counter-examples:
Sotah 4b says that Ben Azzai was unmarried.
On Kiddushin 71b R. Yehudah of Pumbeditha is asked why his son, R. Yitzchak, is not yet married (and is an adult).
Kiddushin 82a does argue that an unmarried man cannot teach children, but this appears to be a concern about the appearance of impropriety, not a question about his ability or knowledge.
So no, rabbis are NOT required to be married.
Rambam Hilchot Ishut 15:3
מי שחשקה נפשו בתורה תמיד ושגה בה כבן עזאי ונדבק בה כל ימיו ולא נשא אשה אין בידו עון והוא שלא יהיה יצרו מתגבר עליו, אבל אם היה יצרו מתגבר עליו חייב לישא אשה ואפילו היו לו בנים שמא יבוא לידי הרהור.
Someone who wished to only study Torah his whole life like Ben Azzai (See Monica Cellio's answer) and clings to it his whole life and never married, he does not have a sin on his hands. This only applies if his desires do not get the better of him, but if he cannot control his desires he must marry, even if he has children [from a previous marriage].
According to Rambam, getting married is highly recommended, even for a rabbi, but is not an absolute requirement.
To: BuffaloJack; PJBankard; scottjewell; ebb tide; Sirius Lee; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; ...
It makes sense that Jesus would have a wife. Jesus was addressed as Rabbi by his followers. Since Jesus was a Jew and would have followed Jewish law, Jewish law stated that you cannot be a Rabbi unless you are married.
Uh, no. Not even close. But keep trying, it gives us a good laugh now and then.
33 posted on
09/18/2012 6:08:47 PM PDT by
narses
To: BuffaloJack
I don’t know if that’s true, but even so...
...there is “addressed as” and there is actually “BEING” a “rabbi”.
36 posted on
09/18/2012 6:10:47 PM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
To: BuffaloJack
Jewish law stated that you cannot be a Rabbi unless you are married.
Scripture please, from the Bible.
To: BuffaloJack
66 posted on
09/18/2012 8:10:21 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
To: BuffaloJack
It makes sense that Jesus would have a wife. Jesus was addressed as Rabbi by his followers. Since Jesus was a Jew and would have followed Jewish law, Jewish law stated that you cannot be a Rabbi unless you are married. Where does it state that?
69 posted on
09/18/2012 8:29:13 PM PDT by
MarkBsnr
(I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson