The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife? When Sensationalism Masquerades as Scholarship

http://www.albertmohler.com ^ | September 20, 2012 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.

[daniel1212]

How dare you disagree with liberal revisionists from Harvard. And in which none of the students obey the early requirements: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/HARVARD_LAWES.HTML

[johngrace]

I just read it. Sad that it started out with such Christ faith principles. So sad. Now dictators have gone there.

[Cronos]

This piece of poor scholarship is not as bad as Dan Brown's book which was fiction masquerading as fact.

Even an ardent "Let's prove Christianity wrong" advocate will admit that a small fragment of a text written 300+ years after Christ with no complete sentences cannot be taken to definitely mean anything....

[circlecity]

Given that the “researchers” can provide absolutely no provenance for this fragment the odds are overwhelming that it is a fake. We don’t know when it was found, where it was found, who found it or the circumstances of its discovery. Like I said, most likely a fake.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Well, their timing is a bit off. They usually save this kind of “OMG, this Changes Everything” “Blockbuster” to hit the headlines just before Christmas and Easter, don’t they? To the MSM, this must be Christmas in September.

[daniel1212]

Like as with many prohomosexual polemicists, a text can mean pretty much whatever they want it to mean.