Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rashputin; daniel1212
LOL! Well, we who are not under the human authority in Rome might have more opportunity to combat unfair stereotype of our Catholic cousins if we weren’t all the time under constant fire from the same. Kind of affects the concentration, don’t ya know. And we do have a common enemy, as the subject of this thread demonstrates. But your post took us down another road, laying on us (who believe in Father, Son and Spirit at least as vigorously as you do) the blame for modern atheistic relativism, and so you really should not be too surprised at a spirited rejection of such a ludicrous claim.

The real irony here is that it is Aquinas, not Luther, who, at least according to some, opened that Pandora’s box:

Philosopher Leonard Peikoff, a Randian Objectivist, and therefore certainly not a Protestant, writes:

“What—or who—ended the Middle Ages? My answer is: Thomas Aquinas, who introduced Aristotle, and thereby reason, into medieval culture. In the thirteenth century, for the first time in a millennium, Aquinas reasserted in the West the basic pagan approach. Reason, he said in opposition to Augustine, does not rest on faith; it is a self-contained, natural faculty, which works on sense experience. Its essential task is not to clarify revelation, but rather, as Aristotle had said, to gain knowledge of this world. Men, Aquinas declared forthrightly, must use and obey reason; whatever one can prove by reason and logic, he said, is true. Aquinas himself taught that faith is valuable as a supplement to reason. But this did not alter the nature of his revolution. His was the charter of liberty, the moral and philosophical sanction which the West desperately needed. His message to mankind, after the long ordeal of faith, was in effect: “It is all right. You don’t have to stifle your mind anymore. You can think.”

And that is how I also learned the history of the evolution of the enlightenment, though I learned this from a Christian law school professor who was Catholic in sympathies if not formally so, though I do believe Peikoff also oversimplifies things. Aquinas began a noble project, not intended to contaminate Christian thought with pagan constructs, but to recapture the good from Aristotle and consolidate it under the banner of Christendom. But in that process he moved away from the Augustinian relationship between faith and reason and made them out to be near equal companions rather than master and servant. This paved the way for the founding of modern philosophy as an independent exercise of reason, and made fertile ground for the Darwinian scientific revolution in thought, which has far more to do with modern relativism than anything Luther and Calvin cooked up. If anything, their reform views were a serious attempt to reinstate the Augustinian balance, and thus represent the more conservative impulse.

Now I know we can and probably will go on at great length about the whole constellation of issues that separate us, and that’s all well and good if it is conducted with some mutual respect, and with a view to building up and not tearing down. But please understand, we who honor Christ, and the words of Christ, are not even going as far as your own Aquinas in terms of liberating our reason, but are merely using the natural reason God gave all men, aided by God’s own Spirit, who is specially promised to all who believe, to subject ourselves to the authority of the God-breathed Scriptures, not ourselves or other men, which is why we share a common confession in so many important particulars with our “separated brethren” across the Tiber. It’s in the Book, for all to see. We should be careful not to disturb the cords that bind us, if at all possible, and especially for reasons that have so little basis in fact.

Peace,

SR

49 posted on 10/02/2012 12:07:59 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; HarleyD; ...
Due to the preponderance of papal promotion by parishioners who preach a elitist church rather than exalting Christ, which is not the same thing in this case, then the overall fruit of a self proclaimed OTC needs to be documented once is a while (though like the house of Judah, evangelicalism is also in spiritual declension, even if to a lesser degree)

The below are excerpts from STATISTICS COMPARING CATHOLICS + EVANGELICALS

THEOLOGICAL VIEWS AND PRACTICES


54 posted on 10/02/2012 1:44:45 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson