[PapaBear3625]

I'm not voting for a man to serve as my spiritual leader.

I'm voting for a man who has the job of maintaining a safe environment to live, work, and raise a family, and to create a decent economic situation.

As such, as long as I have confidence in his honesty and his loyalty to the Constitution, I am unconcerned with his theology as long as he does not hinder my right to practice my theology. As a Catholic, there are plenty on this board who would have issues with MY religion, should I ever be masochistic enough to seek public office. Good day.

[Colofornian]

I'm not voting for a man to serve as my spiritual leader. I'm voting for a man who has the job of maintaining a safe environment to live, work, and raise a family, and to create a decent economic situation.

(And we all know that THE leader of the free world has absolutely nothing to do with needing qualities such as discernment, an ability to guard against deception -- vs. say, gullibility or vulnerability to deception...why, that quality only applies to "spiritual leaders"...) /sarc

[Elsie]

I'm voting for a man who has the job of maintaining a safe environment to live, work, and raise a family, and to create a decent economic situation.

As I said before; there is nothing wrong with this; as Mitt WILL be doing it much better than Barak.

I just want to inform folks that he DOES bring certain baggage into the White house.

I want them to NOT be able to say...

"Oh, gosh! I didn't know..."