Thank you so much for your consideration, I'll try to make sure people who are not part of the conversation understand what is going on.
BD “is false citation of that “rule” or guideline, for reason that Colofornian was not attempting to read your mind or attribute motive, but was speaking of what he “took away from reading”...
It was an invitation to tell him what I thought he was thinking, and I was declining based on the rule, thanks!
Don't bother to ping anyone, the point was that you can find something bad to say about anyone, but it doesn't make it true. (So I'm not saying any of that is true.)
One more example, the Sanhedrin convicted Jesus of blasphemy for saying he was the son of God... Which he was.
BD “Show me what the Mormon Church has done that is a greater.”
Not gonna play that game. What I think is great, you'll dismiss as worthless.
I really don't care if you think the LDS are “Great” or not, we don't do stuff to be seen of men.
Delph
Claiming now;
is more continuation of the diversion away from the question posed, for he did not ask you to mind read, but told you directly at that time what he DID "[take] away from reading", which lead to a follow-up question then posed to you.
Should the question be asked again?
But men DO see that you are FAILING to follow your own 'scripture' and even your own PROPHET has said you'll be DAMNED for it.
You people are to be most pitied...