Replies

you can read the secular history -- it will show you that

Constantine never was head of the church
Constantine never was a bishop
Constantine never had the title vicar of christ
Constantine did not encourage the growth of any ecclesiastical system, Catholic Bishops were ordained fom the Apostles to the present, Constantine or no Constantine
the rapture is unknown to the Bible, only being invented in the 19th century.
Constantine never used the title "Vicar of Christ". Ignatius of Antioch applied an expression (in Greek) similar to it to every bishop -- but that was two hundred years before Constantine. The title "Vicarius Christi" was first applied to a single individual in the person of Pope Gelasius I, two hundred years after Constantine
Old Connie also never "assumed leadership of the Christian church," and in fact, wasn't a Christian at all until he was on his deathbed.

The truth is that the beliefs that were held by the Early Christians before the 4th century remained and remain the beliefs of the Church as a whole.

What many of the fake "Dave-type" story writers don't tell you is that

Constantine didn't make Christianity the state religion -- he just made it such that Christians would not be persecuted officially
Constantine wasn't the first Roman emperor to do this -- his co-Emperor did it earlier
Christianity was made the State religion nearly a century later under Theodosius
Christians outside the Roman Empire -- the Assyrian Church of the East which was under the Roman enemies the Sassanid Persians -- they retained beliefs more akin to orthodoxy than to non-orthodoxy

Well, you might try reading Jaroslav Pelikan’s magesterial four (or is it five?) volume history of the Church.

I point to it because Pelikan is arguably the greatest Church historian of the twentieth century. Incidentally, he was raised Lutheran and ordained as a Lutheran pastor, but after years of studying the history of the Church converted to Orthodox Christianity in 1998, eight years before his death, reposing as an Orthodox layman.

You could also go to the original sources and read the Ante-Nicene Fathers (I commend the Didache, the letters of St. Ignatius of Antioch, the Martyrdom of Polycarp, the Apology of St. Justin the Philosopher — called Justin Martyr in the West). Read them at face-value, ignoring any modern commentary on them which will always have confessional biases.

You can then skip ahead a few years and read the Catechetical Homilies of St. Cyril of Jerusalem — delivered in 341 or 342 after Hunt would aver St. Constantine “corrupted” the Church (we Orthodox venerate him as a saint, the Latins Hunt’s bizarre claims that Constantine “founded the Catholic Church” notwithstanding, don’t).

The whole point of St. Cyril’s homilies — delivered to those to be received into the Church that Pascha — is to demonstrate that Nicene Christanity is Biblical Christianity: he proves every point of the Nicene Creed from Scripture (although his hermeneutic method, which involves heavy application of typology may seem foreign to Biblical literalists, whose hermeneutic method seems to be “the Bible is true when read as if addressed primarily to 17th to 21st century rationalists”.) (In the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita and Mid-America St. Cyril’s homilies are our standard catechetical materials — I’m starting a class this evening at our little Orthodox chapel studying them on behalf of one catechumen and a few of the faithful who want a refresher course.)