Gaffer, I guess you don't understand this thread.
Why would I want to "refute" these 95 theses when I agree with the overwhelming majority of these as produced by its originator?
Since I don't agree with all of them, it's not my responsibility to further document concerns as delineated within all 95 of these...
Beyond that, some of these "these" 95 theses are concerns I haven't even heard of before...so why would I have further documentation of them? [Ludicrous comment by you on that]
Advisement to you: Please read the articles and posts with greater clarity before commenting upon them...
I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that the comment was made in jest.