Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
In a paper published in 2005, chemist Raymond Rogers, member of the 1978 research team, challenged the claim that the shroud is a fake. He said the sample used in the 1988 carbon testing was a piece used to mend the cloth in the Middle Ages and that the methodology of the testing was erroneous.

Before he died, Raymond Rogers withdrew his belief that the Shroud was from the Middle Ages. As a result of questions raised by research provided by Sue Benford, he went back and did more testing. He confirmed that the carbon dating was performed on a portion of the Shroud that was repaired.

8 posted on 04/28/2013 1:13:33 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sand88

And the repair had to date from the Middle Ages where a report arises about the shroud being repaired. In short, the shroud is easily older than the material introduced in the repaired part!


14 posted on 04/28/2013 1:22:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: sand88

Ray Rogers never believed the Shroud was from the middle ages.


111 posted on 05/02/2013 3:49:24 AM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson