You obviously failed to read any more from the link I provided. There are MANY scripture passages used. Perhaps if you had done so before rushing to call the author a “clown”, you might not look so clownish yourself?
Yes, I did. I read a lengthy purely postulative drivel that makes reference to the author's "several books on the gospel and particular historical issues", but managed for several pages that you did post make no salient point of any kind. If there is anything worth arguing about in the rest of his opus, point it out and I will comment on that. What I see so far is pompous chest-beating and that is what I comment upon.