Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon

[[I believe in elements of evolution]]

Micro evoltuion, or rather adaptaTION is a biologically proven fact- however, mega-evolution- or rather evoltuion as described by Darwin, is not possible-

[[This feeds in to the “fine-tuning” argument, that says that it is impossible this happened by chance, pointing to a conscious, designing mind.]]

Last i heard peopell ike demski beleive Nature is that ‘mind’ which created and directed INFORMATION- Yet I’m not sure how he beleives nature is a conscious calculating ‘force’ capable of irreducibly complex arrangements- but whatever, He’s close ot hte truth, he just unfortunately misses the whole truth by 10 to the 2,000,000th power


18 posted on 05/29/2013 2:40:51 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

Nature is not a mind. We have absolutely no evidence for this. In fact, this is actually a ridiculous assertion, akin to believing in a literal ‘Mother Nature’.

Besides, if he believes so-called ‘nature’ is a conscious, calculating force.... well, that sounds a whole lot like God to me.


25 posted on 05/29/2013 2:48:56 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop
Micro evoltuion, or rather adaptaTION is a biologically proven fact- however, mega-evolution- or rather evoltuion as described by Darwin, is not possible-

That's my belief.

32 posted on 05/29/2013 2:52:16 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

There is a disconnect between those who assume, based on the Creation as revealed in Genesis, that all the information necessary for the adaptation of species to the environment in which they live was present at the time of creation, and in the animals that were on the Ark,

versus those who assume that this information was added to the species through mutation over millions of years.

The latter belief is circular with no basis other than itself.


63 posted on 05/30/2013 9:18:22 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson