Incorrect, yet again. Wuerl isn't Pelosi's Bishop, a fact which escapes you and which you coveniently omitted.
And second? Pelosi, as a San Franciscan, "isn't part of my flock!''
One would think that after having been caught engaging in dishonest behavior time after time, you'd stop that nonsense. However, your lack of character and integrity always seems to percolate to the surface, doesn't it? You simply can't help yourself.
If Cordileone contacted Wuerl and informed him that Pelosi was under an interdict and could not receive Communion, Wuerl would be obligated to comply just as he was obligated to comply, albeit reluctantly, with Naumann regarding Sebelius.
It's not my fault. She's not my responsibility.
Nobody has the guts to take a stand and ex-communicate her.
Talk is cheap. When the Catholic church puts some actions to its words, then they'll have some credibility.
As the link you offer for substantiation of "a fact which escapes you and which you coveniently omitted," inferring motive, was actually posted by Murphy, i doubt it was intentional, but perhaps a lack of careful reading or memory.