[raygunfan]

Itz a ‘catch 22’ , when you adhere to non-scriptural ‘’sola scriptura’’, you can READ INTO scripture whatever you need, to ‘support’ SS......

[James C. Bennett]

Goes the other way too, when things are chosen by human consensus and committee.

[righttackle44]

Itz a ‘catch 22’ , when you adhere to non-scriptural ‘’sola scriptura’’, you can READ INTO scripture whatever you need, to ‘support’ SS......

Not true. Properly investigated Scripture cannot be distorted in ways you describe. When all Scripture is presumed to be Divinely-inspired, it is read in context, and read with the presumption that each word has a literal meaning in it's historical context, then the READ INTO hypothesis simply falls apart under the weight of it's own fallacies.