Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

He was a Catholic, then a heretic, then a Protestant.

He didn’t like Hebrews, revelation, and James, among others.


423 posted on 06/25/2013 7:44:40 PM PDT by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]


To: impimp; Elsie
He didn’t like Hebrews, revelation, and James, among others.

Luther never removed ANY books from his German translation of the Bible. He even translated the Apocryphal books and included them, too. Some Catholics don't like the epistles of St. Paul. So what?

425 posted on 06/25/2013 8:23:24 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

To: impimp
He didn’t like Hebrews, revelation, and James, among others.

Sounds like he was in good company.

Didn't a bunch of Catholics get together and decide which books THEY liked?

They became the NT; if I recall correctly.

432 posted on 06/26/2013 4:23:55 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

To: impimp; Elsie
[Luther] was a Catholic, then a heretic, then a Protestant. He didn’t like Hebrews, revelation, and James, among others.

And Catholics don't like Paul. Your point is?

435 posted on 06/26/2013 6:10:51 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson