Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
it's the opposite of what I believe.

I have no doubt about that. It's why I said don't get caught up in it. You listed them after cohabitation, abortion, etc. as if the wrongs of man/women can justify their depravity. While you showed how mighty we have fallen as a society, this article, IMO, is mocking the 'traditionalists' into accepting 'homo' marriage is just as valid - with their 'beam in their own eye' comment.

25 posted on 08/06/2013 1:42:35 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name
"You listed them after cohabitation, abortion, etc. as if the wrongs of man/women can justify their depravity"

Justify? No, it's exactly the opposite. I listed homosexual intercourse together with cohabitation, abortion, etc. in order to show that NONE of them are justified. The males and females, by their depravity, degraded marriage even before gays decided to adopt pseudo-"marriage" as part of their agenda.

Through most of the 20th century, gays and sexual activists were generally anti-marriage. They described it as a regressive, bourgeois structure. They didn't make a strategic pivot toward "marriage" until very, very recently. The first laws in history enabling same-sex so-called "marriage" were not enacted during the first decade of the 21st century.

30 posted on 08/06/2013 2:10:01 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson