Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sasportas
Would you please cite dishonest posts by particular Catholics --- handy if you could link them like this (#28) so we can evaluate them ourselves --- rather than administering a broad-brush tarring without examples or evidence?

Honesty is a matter of honor which I take seriously, and, as a Catholic, personally.

37 posted on 09/02/2013 11:10:44 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Credulity means believing something on little evidence, on no evidence, or against the evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

I read your posts on this thread, you appear to have made an honest attempt to answer the assertion of this thread, rather than attacking the ex-nun. You may be an honest lady yourself, but your post, however, amounts to a cover-up for a liar, the Pope during the decretals. He lied according to what one Bible handbook I have says:

Whether Nicolas [Nicolas !, 858-867, Pope during the Pseudo-Ididorian Decretals, first Pope to wear a crown] knew them to be forgeries, at least HE LIED (my caps) in stating that they had been kept in the archives of the Roman Church from ancient times. They served their purpose in stamping the claims of the Medieval Priesthood with the authority of antiquity.

The Papacy which was the growth of several centuries, was made to appear as something complete and unchangeable from the very beginning. The object was to ante-date by five centuries the Pope’s temporal power. It strengthened the Papacy more than any other agency, and formed to a large extent the basis of the canon law of the Roman Church.


50 posted on 09/02/2013 1:18:33 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson