Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

Maybe it made some kind of economic sense. Cheaper than building a new cathedral from scratch? But it’s an ugly looking building. It joins the ranks of some other really ugly-looking modernist cathedrals in California.

A cathedral should be beautiful, and it should focus the congregation’s attention on the altar and the Mass. It still looks like what it was, a Mega Church built and run by boastful pastors who went a little too far and couldn’t pull it off.


12 posted on 09/13/2013 8:50:42 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
It joins the ranks of some other really ugly-looking modernist cathedrals in California.

The ugliest is the Our Lady of the Angels cathedral in Los Angeles.

However, last year, the Our Savior Church, a beautiful Catholic house of worship built in the Italian Romanesque style, opened a block north of USC.


21 posted on 09/13/2013 9:04:15 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

There were some great articles about this a couple years ago. The Catholic Church saved a bundle by buying this property and the land rather than building a new facility.

What is interesting about this building is how Schuler insisted on an all glass building despite the earthquake building codes. I don’t think there could be another approved there. I remember when he built it growing up.


31 posted on 09/13/2013 9:45:41 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson