Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley; RitaOK; ebb tide

You beat me to it! :-)
I was just going to send a post re: the 2nd chapter of Romans.

Thanks. :-)


27 posted on 12/10/2013 9:29:24 AM PST by Running On Empty (The three sorriest words: "It's too late")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Running On Empty

Both are quite true. Paul is not divided. Paul in Romans applies to the letter. Saint Paul to the letter absolutely applies and supplies his example for evangelization, the harvesting— bringing in the lost toward their salvation and toward the exact understanding of Romans that you cite.

I think we talk past one another here. The point I am trying for is that evangelizing persons is a process, unending and daily actually.

For example, I can not expect that the atheist will have our stricter understanding of the Romans citation instantly, but he may be attracted by the patience, charity and hope he sees in the kind efforts of the evangelizer. Where that may lead, for the atheist, is known only by God.


29 posted on 12/10/2013 10:19:46 AM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Running On Empty; markomalley

Mark, I meant to ping you also.


30 posted on 12/10/2013 10:22:49 AM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson