That is impossible without your exegesis.
His “exegesis” is really eisegisis.
Had he gone from the text rather than injecting a false interpretation into the text, we wouldn’t be having this exchange.
.
Exegesis?
Exegesis?
how can one have a meaningful discussion on the Scriptures with someone that:
doesn’t realize that according to the Scriptures any time days are counted, the day of the event is day one?
doesn’t realize according to the Scriptures, any part of a day is counted as a whole day?
thinks that the Apostles were Torah observant?
thinks that Constantine started the “Roman” Church?
it would be like trying to discuss history with someone that thinks the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor in 1941, i guess you could have the discussion, it’s just wouldn’t be very fruitful!