“which insults Prot faith”
Thank you so much. Finally, finally we get to the root of the matter.
To some degree we all decide for ourselves what is and is not insulting. However, it is in Western Civilization thought better to apply the reasonable man standard to those decisions.
You, and I am not mind-reading but rather inferring from actions, find a truly remarkable range of things insulting—at least when it comes to your religion.
Your definition of “insulting” leaves no room for disagreement, humor, or banter, much less for irony. That explains why you kept insisting that statements were bigoted when they weren’t.
I’m sorry: I actually thought you were either stupid or malicious.
Albert Ellis would have known what to do about this.
Besides being a non-Christian led by the devil. When you actually an articulate an cogent argument against those of mine that your resort to countering with such charges, and refuse to answer fundamental questions, then you might be less of an argument against Rome. Though that may simply be add to the evidence against her.