[Salvation]

It was not made in a derogatory sense. I just know two things.

First, you don’t have the entire Bible if you are using the KJV.

Secondly, because I have never owned or perused a KJV, I have no idea about the footnotes.

Catholic Bibles have approved footnotes that have been there by scripture scholars. Study bibles have even more.

BTW, if you are a baptized Catholic you will ALWAYS be a Catholic. Your baptismal mark does not go away. Were you also confirmed in the Catholic Church?

[Former Fetus]

You may want to have a look at a KJV so that you know what you are talking about, although I would strongly recommend the New King James. You will find out that it has cross references and footnotes (although briefer than the ones in my Catholic Bible). If you look at a study Bible it's the same, more footnotes.

I used to feel like that, I could only have "my" version of the Bible or else... Now I have Bibles from other denominations, the Book of Mormon... How else can I witness to someone if I don't know where they are coming from?

[aMorePerfectUnion]

“First, you don’t have the entire Bible if you are using the KJV.”

Back at ya... you just shared an opinion. It is no more valid than someone telling you that if you have more than the KJV, you have included non-inspired books.

“Catholic Bibles have approved footnotes that have been there by scripture scholars. Study bibles have even more.”

Note the footnotes are not inspired.

“BTW, if you are a baptized Catholic you will ALWAYS be a Catholic. Your baptismal mark does not go away. Were you also confirmed in the Catholic Church?”

Not a thing in Scripture about a “baptismal mark”.