But they are both described the same way. I wouldnt use that argument anymore.
That's exactly why I referred to "credibility" in the earlier post.
You are presented with facts of a distinction, you close your eyes, walk away, and say "They're both described the same way. "
So. I repeat: "Incredible. "
You have proven nothing. You are criticizing “the Latin” and then go on to say the “right” translation is the Greek.
But the Greek describes Christ and Stephen the same way.
The only thing that’s incredible is your pitiful argument. Like I said, if I were you, I would refrain from using the “Greek is better” argument.