Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/01/2014 1:08:44 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PhilipFreneau

bfl!


2 posted on 06/01/2014 1:29:54 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (In America, we don't do pin pricks. But sometimes we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau

Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears: let the weak say, I am strong.

Joel 3:10 KJV


3 posted on 06/01/2014 1:34:59 PM PDT by preacher (I am not a global warming hoax denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau
They Shall Beat Their Swords Into Plowshares! (Isaiah 2:4)

"Beat your plowshares into swords and your pruning hooks into spears..." (Joel 3:10)

A little different outlook.

4 posted on 06/01/2014 3:26:30 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau
Judah and Jerusalem? That appears to be pre-second century language. Recall that after the remnant of Israel and Judah returned from Babylon, they merged into one "kingdom" under the banner of Judah in Judea; hence, the first century name of "Jews" that we are all familiar with. Therefore, Isaiah's time context for this prophecy appears to be prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.

A much more reasonable explanation for why Isaiah mentions Judah (and not Israel) is that during the time of his ministry, the Northern Kingdom was not in existence.

It is also very disturbing that you run off to Revelation, then Hebrews, then back to Revelation, then Acts, then Galatians, etc. etc. ... to provide context and interpretation of a prophecy in the OT.

This highlights what I have been trying to tell you for some time ...

The basic flaw in your approach is not interpretive ... its your theological method that you are employing. By reading the NT back into the OT you transform the OT prophecy of Isaiah into something that it is not. You have yanked Isaiah out of its historical context, almost as if all that historical and OT background is irrelevant.

16 posted on 06/02/2014 7:23:35 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau

Thanks Philip, Good thread.


17 posted on 06/02/2014 10:08:07 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau; Religion Moderator

Philip, I clicked on the link for this article and it goes to your FR homepage. Is there a blog you are operating from where we can see the source of your posting? Or is this considered a ‘vanity’ thread?


19 posted on 06/02/2014 11:14:17 AM PDT by redleghunter (But let your word 'yes be 'yes,' and your 'no be 'no.' Anything more than this is from the evil one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhilipFreneau

BFL


23 posted on 06/06/2014 4:00:13 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson