She is not justifying sodomy, she's saying why she's against sodomy. She does not at any point imply that sodomy could be part of Christian friendship!
She's chaste. Without evidence, you've judged her otheerwise. I hope you're properly abashed.
Now go back and read the article.
Freepers: Proudly posting lengthy comments without ever reading the article. (I’ve done it too !)
Well I read the article (twice) and not once did she chastise the actual sin of homosexuality!!!
She just said acting upon it was bad (sodomy), and wrong against the church. Not once did she mention God’s Law against lustful sin and the profession that sin is actually good!
She’s absolutely flat-out deceitful. We don’t need “in-the-closet” celibate gays to continue to shout, “I was born this way and that’s OK”. Miss Tushnet’s professing her colors without shame and expects a gold star and special treatment for her so-called celibacy. These kinds of acts are what’s tearing down the very core of our Biblical Faith!!!
“YOU DIDN’T READ THE ARTICLE!”
Of course not, silly. This is Free Republic.
Nobody reads the articles, they just read the headline and then spew their opinion based on their own preconceived notion of what the article might actually say.
Been that way for a long time now.