I don't have any of those. But we know Rome does. Have seem many Roman Catholics say so right here on FR.
you must get a rush out of launching unprovoked attacks on others’ religions...
Ummm, let's try to keep up here. Rome had a meeting called Trent. We were declared anathema. They launched the attack, not I.
I don’t have any of those. But we know Rome does. Have seem many Roman Catholics say so right here on FR.
...yes, denial is a wonderful thing, isn’t it...
Ummm, let’s try to keep up here. Rome had a meeting called Trent. We were declared anathema. They launched the attack, not I.
...you really should not attempt verbal sparring, you are quite poor at it...because you refuse to accept the illogical nature of your position, you argue for the sake of argument, not to support the strength of it...but to appease you, let’s examine your above statement...
...I referred you to a post you made today...the Council of Trent occurred four centuries ago; lack of temporal focus is anathema to a well defined logical position...are we keeping up so far...?
...additionally, for all the time you spend declaring yourself free from Romanism, you seem equally determined that you be subjected to its dictates...a completely illogical deduction, which leads one too think that you make your posts on this topic for equally illogical reasons...but we already know that, don’t we...?
...and finally, the only anathemas which are operative on you are of your own weaknesses...and truly, nobody, not Rome, not anybody, cares one whit about it...
You weren't alive then, of course. Trent was 40 years after the Protestant revolt started, so it was hardly a bolt from the blue. The Protestant side was even invited to send representatives, but didn't.