You double-talking sophist, so after declaring that you are not against Paul, you are saying ‘Well, some people hated Paul” to claim that there are separate branches of Christianity? One with all the Apostles, and the other without it, and that they are equal? Stop posting, seriously.
so after declaring that you are not against Paul, you are saying ‘Well, some people hated Paul”>>>>>>>
I don`t remember saying any one hated Paul and I gave you the scripture, I was just stating fact which you choose to ignore.
It does not appear that FRs cultists are even conscious, most of the time.>>>>>>>
I don`t know what you consider cults so i can only assume it is any one who disagrees with your jibberish.
Any real Christian who disagreed with people who doubted Paul would at least acknowledge scripture given to them as reason for their doubt and then they could see where the doubt came from and try to explain it away as could be the case or admit it was reason for doubt, but no, not you.
A few scriptures were pointed out to me, i did not start throwing a hissy fit i simple went to the scripture they indicated and could see that it was a reason for them to doubt Paul but not to the extent that some do..
I saw no reason to throw a fit and start making accusations even though i was not convinced, i am still not convinced of anything except the fact that they do have an honest reason for their opinion.
So i can only conclude you do not want to go there and discuss it from where it comes.
Are you afraid that you will start doubting Paul?
I believe Jesus is my savior not Paul, but i can see that if you start doubting Paul then you have nothing.
It is someone who makes specious and stupid arguments.
I don`t remember saying any one hated Paul and I gave you the scripture, I was just stating fact which you choose to ignore.
You stated that they called him a liar and a false Apostle (which, actually, it doesn't, it only says that they "turned away" from him because of his imprisonment), this is most certainly "hate." As for "choosing to ignore" something. Your argument is so stupid that there is not much to say about it. There is no real cause for doubt just because Paul is attacked by some, when he is embraced by all the Apostles. And you, in your absolute shadiness, still refuse to actually give any specifics about what you believe is "true" Christianity. So all you do is tell us how terrible Paul is, without bothering to explain where it is you actually differ with Paul!
You are nothing more than a troll.