[mlo]

"While this is not the first scientific proof of God, it is interesting."

It would be the first, if it were proof, which it isn't.

[RoosterRedux]

For a believer, proof of God is all around us. I see His finger print in my garden, in my cats, in my 94 y/o mother.

If you don't see Him, perhaps you aren't looking.

[cripplecreek]

I don’t think science is supposed to find proof of God. We all find things that we may feel are proof of God in our own eyes but scientific proof would be destructive to faith.

[theBuckwheat]

The “Bible Code” was debunked. Don’t get your hopes up with this. It may just be a form of linguistic “curve fitting”. If it were true, it would have to have fidelity across thousands of years of mutations and interracial breeding.

[353FMG]

I agree.

God will not reveal Himself through scientific proof especially when He has already done so through His Son.

It would be an offense to His Son and an injustice to all the martyrs who sacrificed their lives through an act of FAITH.