Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Pope Francis is not a Communist
Aleitia.org ^ | March 7, 2014 | Mark Gordon

Posted on 07/05/2014 5:53:22 AM PDT by Kolokotronis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: The Grammarian

“I am completely unsurprised that you would say this.”

And I am completely surprised that you would ignore even the bits of support I provided for my statement.

That’s how you have remained at your current level of development.


61 posted on 07/09/2014 5:08:12 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Resorting to ad hominem attacks now, are we? Good to know that I frustrate you so.


62 posted on 07/09/2014 10:12:38 AM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian

“Resorting to ad hominem attacks now, are we?”

You can’t be serious.

Look up the definition of argumentum ad hominem.

“Good to know that I frustrate you so”

It is normal and appropriate to be frustrated by willful wrong-headedness. I don’t know why you would consider that a badge of honor.


63 posted on 07/09/2014 11:27:05 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Ad hominem: marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made.

I only replied with the Christianity Today article because it was relevant to the discussion you had decided was no longer worth rebuttal. Unfortunately, since that point (and even a few posts before it), you have contributed nothing to the conversation except for remarks like "Now *that's* hard-headed."

Claiming "lack of energy," you have made no effort to answer my contentions and have resorted to parroting "You're wrong" without substantiating just why I am wrong in your eyes.

Sadly, my part in this 'discussion' is done.

64 posted on 07/09/2014 11:47:16 AM PDT by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian

“Ad hominem: marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made.”

It’s only an argumentum ad hominem if it pretends to be an argument. Ordinary pokes in the eye are not included.

“Claiming “lack of energy,” you have made no effort to answer my contentions and have resorted to parroting “You’re wrong” without substantiating just why I am wrong in your eyes.”

Parroting would imply a number of repetitions. It’s not right to use hyperbole to exaggerate a complaint.

Just a note or two above I gave three arguments, and you didn’t make any effort to answer those.

“Sadly, my part in this ‘discussion’ is done.”

You can’t quit; I already fired you.


65 posted on 07/09/2014 5:11:59 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson