To: marshmallow
Incredible. First women "priests" and now women "bishops", and the ecumenical Catholics still continue their folly of "unity", not conversion.
2 posted on
07/14/2014 5:12:08 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
I hate diploma as much as anyone- but in diploma this translates as “This was a bad idea and you really screwed up by doing this”. All the rest is just fluff. The Church doesn’t recognize their orders anyway- so the female “bishops” are no less fraudulent than the male “bishops”.
3 posted on
07/14/2014 6:13:40 PM PDT by
rmichaelj
To: ebb tide
Well one thing’s for certain, there will be no women “priests” or “bishops” for that matter converting from Angelican to Catholicism. The Angelican Church has turned against God and sold it’s soul to the devil.
6 posted on
07/14/2014 7:42:02 PM PDT by
NKP_Vet
To: ebb tide
From the Catholic bishops offices:
The decision of the Church of England to admit women to the episcopate therefore sadly places a further obstacle on the path to this unity between us.Sounds as if Catholic bishops have NO intention of imitating England's Anglicanism in this respect.
To: ebb tide
I don’t normally agree with you, but on this, yes, I agree with you. The aim should be to convert the Anglicans — there are still Christians in that denominations to whom we MUST reach out
8 posted on
07/14/2014 10:46:39 PM PDT by
Cronos
(ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
To: ebb tide
9 posted on
07/15/2014 4:58:33 AM PDT by
piusv
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson