Shocking.
Can’t have it both ways...
Having a pet unicorn is not a human right.
Travel to Narnia is not a human right.
Now even gay “marriage” is not a human right?
When do we get to enjoy fictional creations as a right?
So...the state actually would consider him a woman if he got divorced and so he wouldn’t be able to remarry his wife after he divorced her? But they are considered married now? What if he got the operation before he was actually married and he wanted to marry a man?
Freegards
Uh oh - the two percent is going through a rough patch....
You know what’s odd, some of the so called slippery slope predictions actually are coming true.
In Holland, which is among the first nations to accept same sex marriage. Overall marriage rates among the general population continue to shrink.
“The U.S. Supreme Court declined to say that marriage between persons of the same sex is a right under the U.S. Constitution or international law last year. In a case involving a law that prohibited the U.S. federal government from recognizing marriages between persons of the same sex, the Court ruled that individual states may decide whether or not to allow individuals of the same sex to marry each other.”
Making something that is false, legal, does make it true...it makes it delusion, error, misjudgement, etc. Of course, that is the intent of sexually disordered. It is a shame to see so many US states do it. The spiritual and physical costs of these errors is immense, especially for future generations that will be raised in error.
The state/government/society has a compelling interest in facilitating/encouraging/enforcing the best reasonable social construct for reproduction: monogamous lifetime union of a male and female, aka marriage, in the interest in continuing the population in a stable constructive manner.
The state/government/society does NOT have such an interest in applying the same construct to a pairing in which reproduction is not just impossible but preposterous.