Okay, I didn’t get into the minutiae of Rome’s position, but I assure you the Arminian idea of free will isn’t too far afield from that of the papist. It’s certainly closer to that of Rome than Reformational Protestantism.
I refer you to Canon Four of the Council of Trent:
“If anyone says that man’s free will moved and aroused by God, by assenting to God’s call and action, in no way cooperates toward disposing and preparing itself to obtain the grace of justification, that it cannot refuse its assent if it wishes, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive, let him be anathema.”
What you listed, .45, is quite different from “choosing to be”. It is “co-operation” in the same sense that a drowning man needs to co-operate to be saved.