We are not talking about marriage, we are talking about Luke 1:28 an the other verses that deal with Mary. I provided the Saint Thomas Aquinias Patristic commentary “Catena Aurea” which has all the patristic commentaries on Luke Chapter 1. None, not one had an interpretation that fits Calvin, Knox, or Zwingli. Again, I gave you the theological commentaries on Luke Chapter 1 and it is not only Jerome’s views that are consistent with what I posted, Ambrose, Augustine, Basil and all the others as well.
Good day to you and please don’t post to me again. I have tried to remain as charitable as I can be towards you even though you have thrown the loaded term “cult” numerous times. So again, lets just be done here and please don’t post to me again. I will respond in kind.
That is much another argument from silence, as besides the eisegetical Jerome i found nothing on Lk. 1:28 asserting "full of grace" is what the Greek meant, which it does not. Nor are ECFs always in agreement with each other and or Rome, but it remains that your premise is that Rome must be right and cannot be wrong as the historical steward of Scripture, if she does say so herself, by which reasoning you invalidate the church.
Good day to you and please don’t post to me again. I have tried to remain as charitable as I can be towards you even though you have thrown the loaded term “cult” numerous times
Using straw men such as accusing me of being like a pope is not charitable but ignorance or dishonesty, which the fact remains that both cults and Rome operate out of the same sola ecclesia premise, that their magisterium is the supreme authority, not Scripture, and all your conclusions are driven by that, contrary to objectively examining the evidence in order to ascertain the veracity of RC teaching. To do so would be to doubt the assured veracity of Rome which she claims for herself, and by which you have your assurance. That is cultic, unless Rome is God.
So again, lets just be done here and please don’t post to me again. I will respond in kind.
You have tried this more than once in the past , and it's your call, but don't assume you can respond and expect me to be silence, and you started this by responding to a post that was not to you.