Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981
Jesus was a capitalist, and would have endorsed the Founder's revolt against the British. "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" is if anything a capitalist statement, precisely because the profits one makes off of one's labor and land do not belong to Caesar. If you plan on citing Romans 13:1-2, please continue to read verse 3, which clarifies that the only valid governments are those which are "terrors to evil" (clearly, liberal/socialist governments would not be recognized as legitimate by Scripture).

It's difficult to prosecute people who look at pornography in their homes without unduly invading their privacy. That being said, people have the right to live in a society without smut being shoved down their throats, and I would heartily endorse prosecution of anyone who publicly produces, distributes, consumes, or promotes such filth. One example of a good position is this one.

38 posted on 08/24/2014 8:30:02 PM PDT by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Objective Scrutator
Jesus was a capitalist, and would have endorsed the Founder's revolt against the British. "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" is if anything a capitalist statement, precisely because the profits one makes off of one's labor and land do not belong to Caesar. If you plan on citing Romans 13:1-2, please continue to read verse 3, which clarifies that the only valid governments are those which are "terrors to evil" (clearly, liberal/socialist governments would not be recognized as legitimate by Scripture).

A capitalist in order to give to others; the currency belonged to Caesar, the soul belonged to God. It is folly to presume the LORD blessed rebels who killed so many of their countrymen over money, just as it would be folly to presume approval to rebel against the government now.

It's difficult to prosecute people who look at pornography in their homes without unduly invading their privacy. That being said, people have the right to live in a society without smut being shoved down their throats, and I would heartily endorse prosecution of anyone who publicly produces, distributes, consumes, or promotes such filth. One example of a good position is this one.

To be scriptural you must prosecute all the offenders, including the consumers. Death by stoning I presumably, like they do in Iran.

39 posted on 08/24/2014 9:26:47 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson