It is not my intention to offend you on this subject. I can tell from your posts that you have a big heart and that you are trying to do the right thing.
However, Yes, I am very put off by the Tribunals actions in more than one case in my area.
That, however, does not generalize to "The formal annulment process is often corrupt and unfair."
That you were bothered by it does not mean that it was unjust and unfair. Did you have access to all the depositions, all the testimony? (You ought not to have, in any case, since there's that would be a violation of confidentiality unless you were either the petitioner or the respondent.)
And even if the Tribunal were "corrupt and unfair" in the cases you are thinking of, that does not mean that the process across the board is "often" corrupt and unfair.
It is more likely, I think, that the process is usually exacting, conscientiously applied, and realistically designed to be fair to all parties; sometimes mistaken (not infrequently because of perjured testimony); very, very rarely corrupt.