Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Karl Spooner; jjotto
The Masoretic text, to a traditional Jew, does not determine meaning.

Whether or not this is a good or bad method, I think that the traditional Jew holds the Talmudic traditions more authorative than a private interpretation of the text of Tanach.

Am I correct in this?

62 posted on 09/22/2014 5:47:50 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

The Talmud is not the only record of Jewish tradition. As a guide to practice, it would be quite confusing. It is a mostly a record of arguments and counter-arguments, using acronyms, allusions, abbreviations, and presupposing thorough familiarity with all of Scripture and other texts, and many times is not obvious about which views are correct or even acceptable.

Private interpretations are akin to homilies or sermons, perhaps interesting and instructive, but not determinate. From someone who is not a master of the sacred texts and traditions, private interpretations are almost always just childish delusions.


63 posted on 09/22/2014 6:21:12 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson