[BlueDragon]

Thanks dan.

The OP of this thread has been disproven.

NYer ---

why continue to bring this same sort of half-baked nonsense to FR?

About the only good it does is to possibly allow those not otherwise exposed to issues of formation of canon (of Scripture) to be better able to make determinations as to the matters...and in the end, expose claims made by the RCC as to it's own magesterial infallibility to be ridiculous...

Is that your aim? Are you Alex Murphy in disguise?

Do you read the replies, follow the conversations, go to the sources as those arise, weigh the evidences, etc.?

These kind of threads can be like a stick in the eye.

Why do you persist in this sort of thing (such as posting threads like this)?

It always stirs up animosities...

You've been at it for years now. LITERALLY -- years.

In the end it only discredits & makes the RCC look bad. Which is a SHAME, for not all there is bad. Not at all.

[Alex Murphy]

...why continue to bring this same sort of half-baked nonsense to FR? About the only good it does is to possibly allow those not otherwise exposed to issues of formation of canon (of Scripture) to be better able to make determinations as to the matters...and in the end, expose claims made by the RCC as to it's own magesterial infallibility to be ridiculous... Is that your aim? Are you Alex Murphy in disguise?

I've been test-marketing a take-home version for some time now. I see one of my many landlords has managed to acquire one....