Replies

You are slippery in your many evasions, distractions, billowings of smoke, weird mirrors...but, then again, you are likely only following the lead of your father.

You know resettozero, I was in the process of answering your questions. Had a reply typed up and everything. Then the Holy Spirit came to me and said, "wait a moment."

Now, in the spirit of charity I will answer your questions. First of all if a straight-forward question is asked of me that is not replete with presuppositions, modifiers, qualifiers and an embedded anti-Catholic bias then that person will receive a straight-forward answer.

You may consider what I say to be largely deflective balderdash but I do seem to recall that you and I had the beginnings of a half-way decent dialogue earlier in the thread. Who remembers about what at this point.

Yes, I will defend the Catholic Church and no I will not knowingly lie to do so.

Yes, I will defend the Catholic Church and no I will not knowingly lie to do so. Then the Holy Spirit came to me and said, "wait a moment."

In that case -- and I accept your answer to be reflective of your actual response -- you are in error, because of many of your posted religious opinions on FR, including the post I'm now responding to.

First of all if a straight-forward question is asked of me that is not replete with presuppositions, modifiers, qualifiers and an embedded anti-Catholic bias then that person will receive a straight-forward answer.

Man alive, if i applied that to the questions coming RCs, esp. so as to disallow embedded anti-Prot. bias (though one RC omnisciently declared there never has been any by a Cath. on FR) then i think hardly any would qualify!:)