That’s another topic, as you have to know.
The point is that if people post things that are critical or any religious group or figure, and what they post doesn’t violate any rules, then it is a personal attack to tell them they’re “bashing” or a “basher.” It’s not discussing the article, but accusing the other poster of bad motives.
I also have no problem accepting an anonymous story. People can lie using their own name - the media does all the time - and the fact that their account is anonymous can simply be kept in mind.
Four year old blog posts that allege misconduct 50 years ago?
Somebody signed up today just to post this blog entry?
Time to switch on the radar and figure out what old screen name got banned and why they think sneaking back in to start flame wars is acceptable, right?
Of course not.