Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus; ConservingFreedom; Unam Sanctam; x_plus_one; Patton@Bastogne; Oldeconomybuyer; ...

In the Religion forum, on a thread titled HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH BIBLE - WILLIAM TYNDALE, dangus wrote:
The most pernicious lie in an article chock-filled of lies, distortions, slander and flat out invented nonsense:

“By Tyndale’s day, it was still a crime to translate or read the Bible in one’s mother tongue.”

The Catholic Church did not object to English translations. In fact, there had been published, English-language breviaries for forever. (Breviaries were compilations of readings and prayers from the bible; they typically included the entire New Testament, and all the psalms, prayers, and hymns from the Old Testament. The Catholics objected to Tyndale’s bible because of the commentaries and bad translations.

English translations weren’t more common simply because if you were literate at all, you were literate in Latin. The English language simply was too primitive to even express the Greek arguments.


6 posted on 10/13/2014 6:05:16 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: narses
The English language simply was too primitive to even express the Greek arguments.

No it wasn't.

30 posted on 10/13/2014 8:01:43 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to Repeal and Replace the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson