Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Thane_Banquo

If he attempted to declare ‘ex cathedra’ something so obviously incompatible with the Old and New Testaments, as well as 2,000 years of Catholic doctrine, he would be a manifest heretic.


22 posted on 10/14/2014 10:57:57 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: irishjuggler
...he would be a manifest heretic.

Then what? I ask an honest and sincere question. Is he shown the door?
27 posted on 10/14/2014 11:02:23 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

“If he attempted to declare ‘ex cathedra’ something so obviously incompatible with the Old and New Testaments, as well as 2,000 years of Catholic doctrine, he would be a manifest heretic.”

I would think so, but still, if he has the power to sit in Peter’s recliner and declare revelation, it would not be heresy. It would be divine revelation... one would think.

This raises an additional question - perhaps for a different thread...

If a pope can declare something true by virtue of revelation, why doesn’t Rome update their version of the Scriptures to include this revelation?


36 posted on 10/14/2014 11:20:51 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson